↓ Skip to main content

Carbonate buffering and metabolic controls on carbon dioxide in rivers

Overview of attention for article published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbonate buffering and metabolic controls on carbon dioxide in rivers
Published in
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, April 2017
DOI 10.1002/2016gb005578
Authors

Edward G. Stets, David Butman, Cory P. McDonald, Sarah M. Stackpoole, Michael D. DeGrandpre, Robert G. Striegl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 149 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 24%
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Professor 7 5%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 52 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 11%
Engineering 3 2%
Unspecified 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 45 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,099,699
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#506
of 1,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,512
of 314,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.