↓ Skip to main content

SEX‐SPECIFIC PATTERNS OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSIFICATION: EVOLUTION OF REACTION NORMS AND STATIC ALLOMETRIES IN NERIID FLIES

Overview of attention for article published in Evolution, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SEX‐SPECIFIC PATTERNS OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSIFICATION: EVOLUTION OF REACTION NORMS AND STATIC ALLOMETRIES IN NERIID FLIES
Published in
Evolution, October 2013
DOI 10.1111/evo.12276
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth J. Cassidy, Eleanor Bath, Stephen F. Chenoweth, Russell Bonduriansky

Abstract

The consequences of sex-specific selection for patterns of diversification remain poorly known. Because male secondary sexual traits are typically costly to express, and both costs and benefits are likely to depend on ambient environment and individual condition, such traits may be expected to diversify via changes in reaction norms as well as the scaling of trait size with body size (static allometry). We investigated morphological diversification within two species of Australian neriid flies (Telostylinus angusticollis, Telostylinus lineolatus) by rearing larvae from several populations on larval diets varying sixfold in nutrient concentration. Mean body size varied among populations of T. angusticollis, but body size reaction norms did not vary within either species. However, we detected diversification of reaction norms for body shape in males and females within both species. Moreover, unlike females, males also diversified in static allometry slope and reaction norms for static allometry slope of sexual and nonsexual traits. Our findings reveal qualitative sex differences in patterns of morphological diversification, whereby shape-size relationships diversify extensively in males, but remain conserved in females despite extensive evolution of trait means. Our results highlight the importance of incorporating plasticity and allometry in studies of adaptation and diversification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
India 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 54 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 66%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Evolution
#2,465
of 5,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,319
of 223,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution
#27
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.