↓ Skip to main content

An Integrated Approach to the Biomechanics and Motor Control of Cricket Fast Bowling Techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
An Integrated Approach to the Biomechanics and Motor Control of Cricket Fast Bowling Techniques
Published in
Sports Medicine, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40279-013-0098-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul S. Glazier, Jonathan S. Wheat

Abstract

To date, scientific investigations into the biomechanical aspects of cricket fast bowling techniques have predominantly focused on identifying the mechanical factors that may predispose fast bowlers to lower back injury with a relative paucity of research being conducted on the technical features that underpin proficient fast bowling performance. In this review paper, we critique the scientific literature examining fast bowling performance. We argue that, although many published investigations have provided some useful insights into the biomechanical factors that contribute to a high ball release speed and, to a lesser extent, bowling accuracy, this research has not made a substantive contribution to knowledge enhancement and has only had a very minor influence on coaching practice. To significantly enhance understanding of cricket fast bowling techniques and, therefore, have greater impact on practice, we recommend that future scientific research adopts an interdisciplinary focus, integrating biomechanical measurements with the analytical tools and concepts of dynamical systems motor control theory. The use of qualitative (topological) analysis techniques, in particular, promises to increase understanding of the coordinative movement patterns that define 'technique' in cricket fast bowling and potentially help distinguish between functional and dysfunctional aspects of technique for individual fast bowlers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 179 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 21%
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 7 4%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 42 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 83 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 50 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,768,027
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,001
of 2,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,302
of 203,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#29
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.