↓ Skip to main content

Exercise Training in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise Training in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients
Published in
Sports Medicine, December 2012
DOI 10.2165/11630800-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin J. Howden, Robert G. Fassett, Nicole M. Isbel, Jeff S. Coombes

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health problem that affects an estimated 1.7 million Australians. Patients with CKD commonly progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring dialysis and/or kidney transplantation. They are at high risk of cardiovascular disease and many die from this prior to reaching ESKD. Few therapies are available to slow CKD progression and reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The benefit of exercise training has been well demonstrated in a range of disease conditions including ESKD and was recently highlighted by a systematic review in haemodialysis patients and a recent Cochrane review of all stages of CKD. However, the effects of exercise training in patients with CKD have not been extensively investigated. Our systematic search of the literature found only ten clinical trials in this area. The aim of this review is to review these studies, and to discuss the findings, safety considerations and suggest future areas of research. Overall, the majority of the studies are small, non-randomized, non-controlled trials. They have found that exercise training can increase exercise capacity, improve muscle strength and function, decrease blood pressure, and improve inflammation and oxidative stress biomarkers. The effects of exercise training on kidney function, cardiovascular disease and quality of life are unknown. Studies are needed to answer these questions and develop evidence-based exercise training guidelines for individuals with CKD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 202 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 47 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 15%
Sports and Recreations 32 15%
Psychology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 55 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,737
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,962
of 289,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#303
of 324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.