Title |
High Level of Residual Symptoms in Young Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3229-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Javad Parvizi, Ryan M. Nunley, Keith R. Berend, Adolph V. Lombardi, Erin L. Ruh, John C. Clohisy, William G. Hamilton, Craig J. Della Valle, Robert L. Barrack |
Abstract |
TKA is among the fastest growing interventions in medicine, with procedure incidence increasing the most in younger patients. Global knee scores have a ceiling effect and do not capture the presence of difficulty or dissatisfaction with specific activities important to patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 75% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 220 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 35 | 16% |
Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
Researcher | 24 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
Other | 43 | 19% |
Unknown | 51 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
Engineering | 17 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 7% |
Unknown | 67 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,168,167
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,751
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,975
of 215,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#32
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.