| Title |
The Detrimental Effects of Systemic Ibuprofen Delivery on Tendon Healing Are Time-Dependent
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3258-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brianne K. Connizzo, Sarah M. Yannascoli, Jennica J. Tucker, Adam C. Caro, Corinne N. Riggin, Robert L. Mauck, Louis J. Soslowsky, David R. Steinberg, Joseph Bernstein |
| Abstract |
Current clinical treatment after tendon repairs often includes prescribing NSAIDs to limit pain and inflammation. The negative influence of NSAIDs on bone repair is well documented, but their effects on tendon healing are less clear. While NSAIDs may be detrimental to early tendon healing, some evidence suggests that they may improve healing if administered later in the repair process. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 38% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Egypt | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 6 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 24 | 23% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 37% |
| Engineering | 12 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,576,791
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#188
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,563
of 212,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.