| Title |
Geographical variation and factors influencing modern contraceptive use among married women in Ethiopia: evidence from a national population based survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4755-10-52 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yihunie Lakew, Ayalu A Reda, Habtamu Tamene, Susan Benedict, Kebede Deribe |
| Abstract |
Modern contraceptive use persists to be low in most African countries where fertility, population growth, and unmet need for family planning are high. Though there is an evidence of increased overall contraceptive prevalence, a substantial effort remains behind in Ethiopia. This study aimed to identify factors associated with modern contraceptive use and to examine its geographical variations among 15-49 married women in Ethiopia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 425 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 88 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 10% |
| Researcher | 38 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 62 | 14% |
| Unknown | 146 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 69 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 49 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 11% |
| Unknown | 159 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2013.
All research outputs
#13,747,092
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#976
of 1,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,084
of 204,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.