↓ Skip to main content

Life history traits in a cyclic ecosystem: a field experiment on the arctic fox

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Life history traits in a cyclic ecosystem: a field experiment on the arctic fox
Published in
Oecologia, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00442-013-2641-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomas Meijer, Bodil Elmhagen, Nina E. Eide, Anders Angerbjörn

Abstract

The reproduction of many species depends strongly on variation in food availability. The main prey of the arctic fox in Fennoscandia are cyclic small rodents, and its number of litters and litter size vary depending on the phase of the rodent cycle. In this experiment, we studied if the arctic fox adjusts its reproduction as a direct response to food abundance, in accordance with the food limitation hypothesis, or if there are additional phase-dependent trade-offs that influence its reproduction. We analysed the weaning success, i.e. proportion of arctic fox pairs established during mating that wean a litter in summer, of 422 pairs of which 361 were supplementary winter fed, as well as the weaned litter size of 203 litters of which 115 were supplementary winter fed. Females without supplementary winter food over-produced cubs in relation to food abundance in the small rodent increase phase, i.e. the litter size was equal to that in the peak phase when food was more abundant. The litter size for unfed females was 6.38 in the increase phase, 7.11 in the peak phase and 3.84 in the decrease phase. The litter size for supplementary winter-fed litters was 7.95 in the increase phase, 10.61 in the peak phase and 7.86 in the decrease phase. Thus, feeding had a positive effect on litter size, but it did not diminish the strong impact of the small rodent phase, supporting phase-dependent trade-offs in addition to food determining arctic fox reproduction.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 22%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 56%
Environmental Science 4 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,432,894
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,669
of 4,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,523
of 197,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#16
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.