↓ Skip to main content

Ecosystem metabolism and nutrient uptake in an urban, piped headwater stream

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeochemistry, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Ecosystem metabolism and nutrient uptake in an urban, piped headwater stream
Published in
Biogeochemistry, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10533-013-9900-y
Authors

Amanda J. Hope, William H. McDowell, Wilfred M. Wollheim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Spain 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 93 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 34 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 7%
Engineering 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,761,535
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#728
of 1,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,888
of 204,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.