You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The evolution of sex-specific grandparental harm
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2010
|
DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2010.0409 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
William R. Rice, Sergey Gavrilets, Urban Friberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
Canada | 1 | 10% |
Australia | 1 | 10% |
Israel | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 68 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 32% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 18 | 25% |
Unknown | 6 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 58% |
Psychology | 6 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,344,805
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#6,733
of 11,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,492
of 108,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#60
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.