| Title |
Erratum to: A case report of Grover’s disease from immunotherapy-a skin toxicity induced by inhibition of CTLA-4 but not PD-1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40425-017-0208-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Uemura, Faisal Fa’ak, Cara Haymaker, Natalie McQuail, Elizabeth Sirmans, Courtney W. Hudgens, Lydia Barbara, Chantale Bernatchez, Jonathan L. Curry, Patrick Hwu, Michael T. Tetzlaff, Adi Diab |
| Abstract |
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s40425-016-0157-6.]. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Other | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#681,265
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#160
of 3,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,570
of 421,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.