↓ Skip to main content

Anatomical variability of the anterolateral thigh flap perforators between sexes: a cadaveric study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Plastic Surgery, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Anatomical variability of the anterolateral thigh flap perforators between sexes: a cadaveric study
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00238-012-0778-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mateusz Zachara, Piotr Drozdowski, Mariusz Wysocki, Ireneusz Siewiera, Piotr Wójcicki

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF) has gain popularity as a workhorse flap in the management of simple as well as complex tissue defects. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in ALTF's perforators' location in male and female human cadavers. METHODS: The study involved 30 fresh human cadavers of both sexes. A total of 60 flaps were examined. The flaps were raised as originally designed. After location of vessels, the distance from the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) to subsequent perforators was measured. Also, the kind of the perforator, its diameter and origin were marked. Perforators were designated according to Yu's classification (A, B, and C). The perforators were divided into thin (<0.5 mm), medium (0.5-1 mm), and thick (>1 mm). Ratio of the ASIS-patella distance to the distance of a given perforator from the ASIS (AP rate) was calculated. RESULTS: The mean AP rate (perforator location) was different in both sexes. Mean AP rate in men was calculated as 0.498 ± 0.117, and in women, 0.559 ± 0.114. Differences in AP rate between female and male were statistically significant (t = -3.144; p < 0.002). Mean flap thickness was 3.65 cm in women and 1.17 cm in men (t = -14.444; p < 0.00001). In men, 63 perforators originated from descending branch, and seven perforators originated from oblique branch. In women, there were 67 and one, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In men, perforators are located closer to the ASIS in comparison to women. Clinically significant perforators (Φ > 0.5 mm), in majority of cases, occur in A and B positions. Thickness of the flap was higher in women. The oblique branch was more common in men.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 28%
Student > Postgraduate 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 83%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2013.
All research outputs
#18,348,542
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#389
of 474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,757
of 183,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 474 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.