↓ Skip to main content

Use of LDH and autoimmune side effects to predict response to ipilimumab treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Immunotherapy, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Use of LDH and autoimmune side effects to predict response to ipilimumab treatment
Published in
Immunotherapy, August 2016
DOI 10.2217/imt-2016-0083
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ipilimumab is a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 antibody that enhances T-cell activity and proliferation. In a retrospective analysis of 86 patients the clinical benefits of ipilimumab treatment were correlated with laboratory and clinical data. A lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) value within the normal range before the start of therapy was significantly correlated with better OS (p ≤ 0.009). An increase in LDH level after two cycles was indicative of a poor outcome, and was significantly negatively correlated with treatment response and overall survival and progression-free survival. 42% of all patients suffered from autoimmune toxicity (CTCAE grades 2-4). The occurrence of autoimmune toxicity clearly correlated with clinical benefit. Changes in LDH level and side effects correlate with response to therapy and survival.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2024.
All research outputs
#4,604,701
of 30,697,671 outputs
Outputs from Immunotherapy
#149
of 1,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,295
of 320,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunotherapy
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,697,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.