↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Breathlessness in Lung Cancer: Psychometric Properties of the Dyspnea-12 Questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain & Symptom Management, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of Breathlessness in Lung Cancer: Psychometric Properties of the Dyspnea-12 Questionnaire
Published in
Journal of Pain & Symptom Management, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.08.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing-Yu Tan, Janelle Yorke, Amelie Harle, Jacky Smith, Fiona Blackhall, Mark Pilling, Alex Molassiotis

Abstract

The Dyspnoea-12 (D-12) is a well validated instrument in respiratory illnesses for breathlessness assessment, but its psychometric properties have not been tested in lung cancer. To demonstrate the psychometric properties of the D-12 in lung cancer patients. Baseline data from a lung cancer feasibility trial were adopted for this analysis. D-12 and a series of patient-reported tools including five Numeric Rating Scales (NRS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) were employed for the psychometric assessment. Spearman's correlation coefficients (rs) were used to estimate the convergent validity of the D-12 with the NRS, HADS and LCSS. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to examine construct validity. Reliability was tested by Cronbach's alpha and item-to-total correlations. D-12 score difference between patients with or without anxiety, depression and COPD was explored to identify its discriminate performance. One hundred and one lung cancer patients were included. There were significantly positive correlations between the D-12 and the HADS, LCSS, and NRS scales measuring the breathlessness severity and its associated affective distress. Factor analysis clearly identified two components (physical and emotional) of the D-12. Cronbach's alpha for D-12 total, physical and emotional subscales was 0.95, 0.92 and 0.94, respectively. Patients with anxiety or depression demonstrated significantly higher D-12 scores than those without it, and patients with COPD reported significantly more severe breathlessness than those without COPD. The D-12 is a valid and reliable self-reported questionnaire for use in breathlessness assessment in lung cancer patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Other 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 40 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 16%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 43 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,728,824
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain & Symptom Management
#2,693
of 4,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,894
of 328,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain & Symptom Management
#36
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.