You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chromosomal gains and losses in human papillomavirus-associated neoplasia of the lower genital tract – A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Cancer (1965), September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorenz K. Thomas, Justo Lorenzo Bermejo, Svetlana Vinokurova, Katrin Jensen, Mariska Bierkens, Renske Steenbergen, Marion Bergmann, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, Miriam Reuschenbach |
| Abstract |
Overexpression of the human papillomavirus (HPV) oncogenes E6 and E7 is necessary for the development of distinct lower genital tract cancers. However, secondary cellular genomic alterations are mandatory to promote progression of HPV-induced premalignant stages. We aimed at identifying the chromosomal regions most frequently gained and lost and the disease stage at which the latter occurs. These regions might be relevant for carcinogenesis and could serve as diagnostic markers to identify premalignant lesions with high progression risk towards invasive cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 22% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2017.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#5,429
of 6,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,854
of 213,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#34
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.