↓ Skip to main content

Adaptationist punishment in humans

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bioeconomics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Adaptationist punishment in humans
Published in
Journal of Bioeconomics, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10818-013-9153-9
Authors

Robert Kurzban, Peter DeScioli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Student > Postgraduate 7 16%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 51%
Social Sciences 6 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 9%
Unspecified 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2013.
All research outputs
#19,342,464
of 24,630,122 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioeconomics
#106
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,136
of 195,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioeconomics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,630,122 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.