↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Vessel Pruning and Regression

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Cell, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
415 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanisms of Vessel Pruning and Regression
Published in
Developmental Cell, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The field of angiogenesis research has primarily focused on the mechanisms of sprouting angiogenesis. Yet vascular networks formed by vessel sprouting subsequently undergo extensive vascular remodeling to form a functional and mature vasculature. This "trimming" includes distinct processes of vascular pruning, the regression of selected vascular branches. In some situations complete vascular networks may undergo physiological regression. Vessel regression is an understudied yet emerging field of research. This review summarizes the state-of-the-art of vessel pruning and regression with a focus on the cellular processes and the molecular regulators of vessel maintenance and regression.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 415 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 412 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 26%
Researcher 52 13%
Student > Master 48 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 48 12%
Unknown 106 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 96 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 10%
Engineering 29 7%
Neuroscience 19 5%
Other 38 9%
Unknown 110 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#9,237,040
of 31,660,612 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Cell
#2,637
of 4,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,953
of 292,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Cell
#34
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,660,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.