↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Housestaff Fatigue on Occupational and Patient Safety

Overview of attention for article published in Lung, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
The Impact of Housestaff Fatigue on Occupational and Patient Safety
Published in
Lung, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00408-007-9010-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scot A. Mountain, Bradley S. Quon, Peter Dodek, Robert Sharpe, Najib T. Ayas

Abstract

Extended-duration work shifts (i.e., greater than 24 hours) for housestaff are a long-standing tradition. However, the resultant sleep deprivation and fatigue caused by these extreme work schedules pose potential threats to both physician and patient safety. We believe it is critical to understand the potential adverse consequences of housestaff fatigue to optimize shift schedules and reduce risks to both staff and patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Researcher 7 17%
Other 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 38%
Psychology 3 7%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2013.
All research outputs
#4,677,648
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#129
of 884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,496
of 72,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.