↓ Skip to main content

Usefulness of FibroScan for Detection of Early Compensated Liver Cirrhosis in Chronic Hepatitis B

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Usefulness of FibroScan for Detection of Early Compensated Liver Cirrhosis in Chronic Hepatitis B
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10620-008-0541-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Do Young Kim, Seung Up Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Jun Yong Park, Jung Min Lee, Young Nyun Park, Ki Tae Yoon, Yong Han Paik, Kwan Sik Lee, Chae Yoon Chon, Kwang-Hyub Han

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Researcher 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Engineering 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#1,379
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,183
of 90,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.