↓ Skip to main content

Social group memberships protect against future depression, alleviate depression symptoms and prevent depression relapse

Overview of attention for article published in Social Science & Medicine, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
32 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
387 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
570 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social group memberships protect against future depression, alleviate depression symptoms and prevent depression relapse
Published in
Social Science & Medicine, September 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tegan Cruwys, Genevieve A. Dingle, Catherine Haslam, S. Alexander Haslam, Jolanda Jetten, Thomas A. Morton

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that a lack of social connectedness is strongly related to current depression and increases vulnerability to future depression. However, few studies speak to the potential benefits of fostering social connectedness among persons already depressed or to the protective properties of this for future depression trajectories. We suggest that this may be in part because connectedness tends to be understood in terms of (difficult to establish) ties to specific individuals rather than ties to social groups. The current study addresses these issues by using population data to demonstrate that the number of groups that a person belongs to is a strong predictor of subsequent depression (such that fewer groups predicts more depression), and that the unfolding benefits of social group memberships are stronger among individuals who are depressed than among those who are non-depressed. These analyses control for initial group memberships, initial depression, age, gender, socioeconomic status, subjective health status, relationship status and ethnicity, and were examined both proximally (across 2 years, N = 5055) and distally (across 4 years, N = 4087). Depressed respondents with no group memberships who joined one group reduced their risk of depression relapse by 24%; if they joined three groups their risk of relapse reduced by 63%. Together this evidence suggests that membership of social groups is both protective against developing depression and curative of existing depression. The implications of these results for public health and primary health interventions are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 570 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 564 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 113 20%
Student > Bachelor 82 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 9%
Researcher 45 8%
Other 75 13%
Unknown 131 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 199 35%
Social Sciences 55 10%
Arts and Humanities 32 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 4%
Other 69 12%
Unknown 160 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#246,856
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Social Science & Medicine
#216
of 11,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,784
of 216,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science & Medicine
#2
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.