↓ Skip to main content

Dangerous Reference Graphs and Semantic Paradoxes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Dangerous Reference Graphs and Semantic Paradoxes
Published in
Journal of Philosophical Logic, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10992-012-9246-2
Authors

Landon Rabern, Brian Rabern, Matthew Macauley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 19%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 5 31%
Philosophy 3 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2013.
All research outputs
#15,558,163
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#187
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,248
of 173,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.