↓ Skip to main content

Handheld histology-equivalent sectioning laser-scanning confocal optical microscope for interventional imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Microdevices, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Handheld histology-equivalent sectioning laser-scanning confocal optical microscope for interventional imaging
Published in
Biomedical Microdevices, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10544-009-9377-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karthik Kumar, Rony Avritscher, Youmin Wang, Nancy Lane, David C. Madoff, Tse-Kuan Yu, Jonathan W. Uhr, Xiaojing Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 17%
Physics and Astronomy 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,523,962
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#235
of 752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,787
of 166,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 752 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.