↓ Skip to main content

Effects of various exercise interventions in insomnia patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, July 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 1,613)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
154 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
44 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
6 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators
bluesky
4 Bluesky users
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effects of various exercise interventions in insomnia patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, July 2025
DOI 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113512
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhi-Jun Bu, Feng-Shuang Liu, Md Shahjalal, Yi-Ke Song, Meng-Chi Li, Rong-Er Zhuo, Qing-Hong Zhong, Ya-Wen Du, Chen-Ge Lu, Zi-Han Yang, Han-Yu Yang, Pu Zhong, Jian-Ping Liu, Zhao-Lan Liu

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 26 59%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 26 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2026.
All research outputs
#16,375
of 34,560,573 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#8
of 1,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212
of 352,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,560,573 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.