Title |
The effect of a low-fat, plant-based lifestyle intervention (CHIP) on serum HDL levels and the implications for metabolic syndrome status – a cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition & Metabolism, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1743-7075-10-58 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lillian Kent, Darren Morton, Paul Rankin, Ewan Ward, Ross Grant, John Gobble, Hans Diehl |
Abstract |
Low levels of high-density lipoproteins (HDL) are considered an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and constitute one of the criteria for the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). Lifestyle interventions promoting a low-fat, plant-based eating pattern appear to paradoxically reduce cardiovascular risk but also HDL levels. This study examined the changes in MetS risk factors, in particular HDL, in a large cohort participating in a 30-day lifestyle intervention that promoted a low-fat, plant-based eating pattern. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 32% |
Mexico | 1 | 5% |
Singapore | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Finland | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 18% |
Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Thailand | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 103 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 16% |
Researcher | 10 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,230,732
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#170
of 1,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,918
of 220,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.