↓ Skip to main content

The Effects of Fluid Balance and Colloid Administration on Outcomes in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Neurocritical Care, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
The Effects of Fluid Balance and Colloid Administration on Outcomes in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Published in
Neurocritical Care, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12028-013-9860-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

George M. Ibrahim, R. Loch Macdonald

Abstract

Delayed ischemic neurological deficit (DIND) following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains a significant cause of mortality and disability. The administration of colloids and the induction of a positive fluid balance during the vasospasm risk period remain controversial. Here, we compared DIND and outcomes among propensity score-matched cohorts who did and did not receive colloids and also tested the effect of a positive fluid balance on these endpoints. Exploratory analysis was performed on 413 patients enrolled in CONSCIOUS-1, a prospective randomized trial of clazosentan for the prevention of angiographic vasospasm. Propensity score matching was performed on the basis of age, gender, pre-existing heart conditions, hypertension, nicotine use, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies scores, aneurysm location, clazosentan treatment, subarachnoid clot burden, and severity of angiographic vasospasm. Inferential statistics were used for group-wise comparisons. One hundred twenty-three subjects were matched (41 received colloids, whereas 82 did not). The covariate balance and propensity score distributions were acceptable. There was no difference between the groups with respect to DIND (17 vs. 22%; p = 0.64) or the presence (48 vs. 51%; p = 0.71) or volume of delayed infarcts (volume >7.5 cm3; 62 vs. 48%; p = 0.41). Similarly, no differences were found on multivariate analysis between patients who did and did not have a positive fluid balance, although patients with severe angiographic vasospasm had more delayed infarcts with a negative fluid balance (p = 0.01). Among all subjects, the administration of colloids and a positive fluid balance were associated with worse outcomes on the NIHSS (p = 0.04) and modified Rankin (p = 0.02) scales, respectively. Colloid administration and induction of a positive fluid balance during the vasospasm risk period may be associated with poor outcomes in specific patient groups. Patient selection is of utmost importance when managing the fluid status of patients with aneurysmal SAH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 11%
Other 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 55%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 31 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2018.
All research outputs
#12,883,635
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#844
of 1,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,604
of 195,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.