↓ Skip to main content

JAK1/2 and Pan-Deacetylase Inhibitor Combination Therapy Yields Improved Efficacy in Preclinical Mouse Models of JAK2V617F-Driven Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
JAK1/2 and Pan-Deacetylase Inhibitor Combination Therapy Yields Improved Efficacy in Preclinical Mouse Models of JAK2V617F-Driven Disease
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, November 2013
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-0905
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emeline Evrot, Nicolas Ebel, Vincent Romanet, Claudia Roelli, Rita Andraos, Zhiyan Qian, Arno Dölemeyer, Ernesta Dammassa, Dario Sterker, Robert Cozens, Francesco Hofmann, Masato Murakami, Fabienne Baffert, Thomas Radimerski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Peru 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Engineering 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#11,352
of 13,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,449
of 228,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#137
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.