↓ Skip to main content

Nanotechnology for the treatment of melanoma skin cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Biomaterials, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
Title
Nanotechnology for the treatment of melanoma skin cancer
Published in
Progress in Biomaterials, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40204-017-0064-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas B. Naves, Chetna Dhand, Jayarama Reddy Venugopal, Lakshminarayanan Rajamani, Seeram Ramakrishna, Luis Almeida

Abstract

Melanoma is the most aggressive type of skin cancer and has very high rates of mortality. An early stage melanoma can be surgically removed, with a survival rate of 99%. This literature review intends to elucidate the possibilities to treat melanoma skin cancer using hybrid nanofibers developed by advanced electrospinning process. In this review we have shown that the enhanced permeability and retention is the basis for using nanotechnology, aiming topical drug delivery. The importance of the detection of skin cancer in the early stages is directly related to non-metastatic effects and survival rates of melanoma cells. Inhibitors of protein kinase are already available in the market for melanoma treatment and are approved by the FDA; these agents are cobimetinib, dabrafenib, ipilimumab, nivolumab, trametinib, and vemurafenib. We also report a case study involving two different approaches for targeting melanoma skin cancer therapy, namely, magnetic-based core-shell particles and electrospun mats.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 222 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Researcher 13 6%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 83 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 31 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 11%
Chemistry 16 7%
Engineering 15 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 91 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,539,663
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Biomaterials
#27
of 47 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,310
of 308,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Biomaterials
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 20 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them