↓ Skip to main content

Three major cytogenetic subgroups can be identified among chromosomally abnormal solitary lipomas

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, July 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
224 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Three major cytogenetic subgroups can be identified among chromosomally abnormal solitary lipomas
Published in
Human Genetics, July 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00366238
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nils Mandahl, Sverre Heim, Kristina Arheden, Anders Rydholm, Helena Willen, Felix Mitelman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2004.
All research outputs
#7,523,962
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#940
of 2,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,810
of 13,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.