Title |
Randomized clinical trial of D2 and extended paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, May 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10147-007-0727-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yutaka Yonemura, Cheng-Chung Wu, Norimasa Fukushima, Ichirou Honda, Etsurou Bandou, Taiichi Kawamura, Tohru Kamata, Byung-Sik Kim, Nobuo Matsuki, Toshiharu Sawa, Sung-Hoon Noh, the East Asia Surgical Oncology Group |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 24% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 55% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,523,962
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#150
of 921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,803
of 79,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 921 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.