↓ Skip to main content

Simple sequence length polymorphisms (SSLPs) that distinguish MOLF/Ei and 129/Sv inbred strains of laboratory mice

Overview of attention for article published in Mammalian Genome, August 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Simple sequence length polymorphisms (SSLPs) that distinguish MOLF/Ei and 129/Sv inbred strains of laboratory mice
Published in
Mammalian Genome, August 1998
DOI 10.1007/s003359900842
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angabin Matin, Gayle B. Collin, Yoshinobu Asada, Don Varnum, Diana L. Martone, Joseph H. Nadeau

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,523,962
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Genome
#319
of 1,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,788
of 32,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Genome
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.