↓ Skip to main content

Producing Knowledge about Racial Differences: Tracing Scientists' Use of “Race” and “Ethnicity” from Grants to Articles

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Producing Knowledge about Racial Differences: Tracing Scientists' Use of “Race” and “Ethnicity” from Grants to Articles
Published in
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
DOI 10.1111/jlme.12082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asia Friedman, Catherine Lee

Abstract

The research and publication practices by which scientists produce biomedical knowledge about race and ethnicity remain largely unexamined, and most of the existing research looks at the knowledge production process at a single point in time. In light of this, we specifically focus on the questions of whether and in what ways researchers' discussions of race and ethnicity change over the course of the research process by comparing grant proposals to published articles. Using content analysis, we investigated the use of race and ethnicity in 72 grants funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health between 1990 and 1999 and 144 matched articles published between 1996 and 2010, tracing the production of biomedical knowledge from study design to published findings. This is also the first study to look at whether the NIH Inclusion Mandate, which went into effect in June of 1994, changed the way investigators research and write about racial and ethnic differences. In following this knowledge production process, we explore how scientists "deliver" on their research proposal goals. In addition, we provide insight into whether and how state policies directed at guiding research practices can shape output.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Psychology 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 20%