Title |
Unplanned Hip Arthroplasty Imposes Clinical and Cost Burdens on Treating Institutions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3226-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Atul F. Kamath, Daniel C. Austin, Peter B. Derman, Craig L. Israelite |
Abstract |
Emergent surgery has been shown to be a risk factor for perioperative complications. Studies suggest that patient morbidity is greater with an unplanned hip arthroplasty, although it is controversial whether unplanned procedures also result in higher patient mortality. The financial impact of these procedures is not fully understood, as the costs of unplanned primary hip arthroplasties have not been studied previously. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 22% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 55% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,334
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,876
of 209,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#73
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.