↓ Skip to main content

Narratives Can Motivate Environmental Action: The Whiskey Creek Ocean Acidification Story

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Narratives Can Motivate Environmental Action: The Whiskey Creek Ocean Acidification Story
Published in
Ambio, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13280-013-0442-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan P. Kelly, Sarah R. Cooley, Terrie Klinger

Abstract

Even when environmental data quantify the risks and benefits of delayed responses to rapid anthropogenic change, institutions rarely respond promptly. We propose that narratives complementing environmental datasets can motivate responsive environmental policy. To explore this idea, we relate a case study in which a narrative of economic loss due to regionally rapid ocean acidification-an anthropogenic change-helped connect knowledge with action. We pose three hypotheses to explain why narratives might be particularly effective in linking science to environmental policy, drawing from the literature of economics, environmental policy, and cognitive psychology. It seems that yet-untold narratives may hold similar potential for strengthening the feedback between environmental data and policy and motivating regional responses to other environmental problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Mexico 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 96 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 21%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Other 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 28 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 18%
Social Sciences 12 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 9%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 15 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,017,701
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#165
of 1,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,004
of 207,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.