The evidence on associations between ultra-processed foods (UPF) and lung cancer risk is limited and inconsistent.
Are UPF associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC)？ METHODS: Data of participants in this study were collected from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Dietary intakes were assessed through a validated diet history questionnaire. These foods were categorised using the NOVA classification according to the degree of processing in the PLCO Cancer Screening Cohort. All cases of incident lung cancer were pathologically verified. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the association between consumption of UPF and lung cancer after adjustment for various potential confounders, including key risk factors related to lung cancer and overall diet quality.
A total of 1706 cases of lung cancer cases, including 1473 NSCLC and 233 SCLC, were identified during a mean follow-up of 12.2 years among 101 732 adults (mean age 62.5 years). After multivariable adjustments, individuals in the highest quarters for UPF consumption had a higher risk of lung cancer (HR=1.41, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.60), NSCLC (HR=1.37, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.58) and SCLC (HR=1.44, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.10) compared with those in the lowest quarter. These results remained statistically significant after a large range of subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
Higher consumption of UPF is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, NSCLC and SCLC. Although additional research in other populations and settings is warranted, these findings suggest the healthy benefits of limiting UPF.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1039. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#19,088
of 34,515,982 outputs
Outputs from Thorax
#14
of 7,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255
of 349,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thorax
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,515,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
