↓ Skip to main content

Identifying Risk Factors for Metachronous Colorectal Cancer in Lynch Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, July 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
34 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Identifying Risk Factors for Metachronous Colorectal Cancer in Lynch Syndrome
Published in
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, July 2025
DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.06.040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Hüneburg, Karolin Weber, Stefan Aretz, Verena Steinke-Lange, Elke Holinski-Feder, Matthias Kloor, Silke Redler, Deepak B. Vangala, Evelin Schröck, Andreas Block, Tim Ripperger, Katrin van Beekum, Alexander Link, Christopher Schroeder, Christoph Engel, Jacob Nattermann, German Consortium for Familial Intestinal Cancer, Robert Hüneburg, Karolin Weber, Stefan Aretz, Verena Steinke-Lange, Elke Holinski-Feder, Matthias Kloor, Silke Redler, Deepak B. Vangala, Evelin Schröck, Andreas Block, Tim Ripperger, Katrin van Beekum, Alexander Link, Christopher Schroeder, Christoph Engel, Jacob Nattermann

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2026.
All research outputs
#517,147
of 34,436,843 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#180
of 6,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,534
of 349,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#5
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,436,843 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.