Title |
Metal artefact reduction in gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy CT with and without metal artefact reduction software
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Radiology, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00330-011-2370-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Young Han Lee, Kwan Kyu Park, Ho-Taek Song, Sungjun Kim, Jin-Suck Suh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
Researcher | 20 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Other | 19 | 16% |
Unknown | 21 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 40% |
Engineering | 14 | 11% |
Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 29 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,740,163
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#622
of 4,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,294
of 248,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.