↓ Skip to main content

Association between ultraviolet radiation, skin sun sensitivity and risk of pancreatic cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between ultraviolet radiation, skin sun sensitivity and risk of pancreatic cancer
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, September 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.canep.2013.08.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bich Tran, David C. Whiteman, Penelope M. Webb, Lin Fritschi, Jonathan Fawcett, Harvey A. Risch, Robyn Lucas, Nirmala Pandeya, Annaka Schulte, Rachel E. Neale, for the Queensland Pancreatic Cancer Study Group

Abstract

Ecological studies showing an inverse association between pancreatic cancer incidence and mortality and levels of ultraviolet radiation (UVR), suggest that higher levels of sun exposure may reduce risks of pancreatic cancer but there has been only one individual-level study that examined this issue. We aimed to examine the association between pancreatic cancer and markers of exposure to solar UVR, namely skin type, treatment of skin lesions, ambient UVR and time outdoors on work days.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Engineering 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,279,808
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology
#264
of 1,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,387
of 215,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.