| Title |
The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David A Chambers, Russell E Glasgow, Kurt C Stange |
| Abstract |
Despite growth in implementation research, limited scientific attention has focused on understanding and improving sustainability of health interventions. Models of sustainability have been evolving to reflect challenges in the fit between intervention and context. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 31% |
| Canada | 7 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Senegal | 1 | 1% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 34 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 54% |
| Scientists | 26 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,002 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 990 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 170 | 17% |
| Researcher | 141 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 137 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 95 | 9% |
| Other | 48 | 5% |
| Other | 162 | 16% |
| Unknown | 249 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 167 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 159 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 115 | 11% |
| Psychology | 92 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 38 | 4% |
| Other | 120 | 12% |
| Unknown | 311 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#618,500
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#52
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,035
of 220,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.