↓ Skip to main content

Genetic influences on brain developmental trajectories on neuroimaging studies: from infancy to young adulthood

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Genetic influences on brain developmental trajectories on neuroimaging studies: from infancy to young adulthood
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11682-013-9260-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Douet, Linda Chang, Christine Cloak, Thomas Ernst

Abstract

Human brain development has been studied intensively with neuroimaging. However, little is known about how genes influence developmental brain trajectories, even though a significant number of genes (about 10,000, or approximately one-third) in the human genome are expressed primarily in the brain and during brain development. Interestingly, in addition to showing differential expression among tissues, many genes are differentially expressed across the ages (e.g., antagonistic pleiotropy). Age-specific gene expression plays an important role in several critical events in brain development, including neuronal cell migration, synaptogenesis and neurotransmitter receptor specificity, as well as in aging and neurodegenerative disorders (e.g., Alzheimer disease or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). In addition, the majority of psychiatric and mental disorders are polygenic, and many have onsets during childhood and adolescence. In this review, we summarize the major findings from neuroimaging studies that link genetics with brain development, from infancy to young adulthood. Specifically, we focus on the heritability of brain structures across the ages, age-related genetic influences on brain development and sex-specific developmental trajectories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cuba 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 125 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 26%
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 17%
Neuroscience 18 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 40 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#14,849,289
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#487
of 1,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,271
of 218,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.