You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does an ‘Activity-Permissive’ Workplace Change Office Workers’ Sitting and Activity Time?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0076723 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erin Gorman, Maureen C. Ashe, David W. Dunstan, Heather M. Hanson, Ken Madden, Elisabeth A. H. Winkler, Heather A. McKay, Genevieve N. Healy |
| Abstract |
To describe changes in workplace physical activity, and health-, and work-related outcomes, in workers who transitioned from a conventional to an 'activity-permissive' workplace. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 26% |
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 11% |
| Canada | 3 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 56% |
| Scientists | 9 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 15% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 46 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 31 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 15% |
| Psychology | 19 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 20% |
| Unknown | 55 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,480,460
of 25,109,675 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#18,539
of 217,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,258
of 214,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#499
of 5,023 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,109,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,023 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.