↓ Skip to main content

Satisfaction with psychiatric in-patient care as rated by patients at discharge from hospitals in 11 countries

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Satisfaction with psychiatric in-patient care as rated by patients at discharge from hospitals in 11 countries
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00127-017-1366-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dzmitry Krupchanka, Hind Khalifeh, Jibril Abdulmalik, Sara Ardila-Gómez, Aishatu Yusha’u Armiya’u, Visnja Banjac, Alexey Baranov, Nikita Bezborodovs, Petrana Brecic, Zoran Čavajda, Giovanni de Girolamo, Maria Denisenko, Howard Akena Dickens, Josip Dujmovic, Dubravka Ergovic Novotny, Ilya Fedotov, Marina A. Fernández, Iryna Frankova, Marta Gasparovic, Catalina Giurgi-Oncu, Tanja Grahovac, Bawo O. James, Rabaa Jomli, Ivana Kekin, Rajna Knez, Mariangela Lanfredi, Francesca Lassman, Nisha Mehta, Fethi Nacef, Alexander Nawka, Martin Nemirovsky, Bolanle Adeyemi Ola, Yewande O. Oshodi, Uta Ouali, Tomislav Peharda, Andrea Razic Pavicic, Martina Rojnic Kuzman, Costin Roventa, Rinat Shamenov, Daria Smirnova, Davorka Smoljanic, Anna Spikina, Amalia Thornicroft, Marko Tomicevic, Domagoj Vidovic, Paul Williams, Yulia Yakovleva, Olena Zhabenko, Tatiana Zhilyaeva, Maja Zivkovic, Graham Thornicroft, Norman Sartorius

Abstract

There is disregard in the scientific literature for the evaluation of psychiatric in-patient care as rated directly by patients. In this context, we aimed to explore satisfaction of people treated in mental health in-patient facilities. The project was a part of the Young Psychiatrist Program by the Association for the Improvement of Mental Health Programmes. This is an international multicentre cross-sectional study conducted in 25 hospitals across 11 countries. The research team at each study site approached a consecutive target sample of 30 discharged patients to measure their satisfaction using the five-item study-specific questionnaire. Individual and institution level correlates of 'low satisfaction' were examined by comparisons of binary and multivariate associations in multilevel regression models. A final study sample consisted of 673 participants. Total satisfaction scores were highly skewed towards the upper end of the scale, with a median total score of 44 (interquartile range 38-48) out of 50. After taking clustering into account, the only independent correlates of low satisfaction were schizophrenia diagnosis and low psychiatrist to patient ratio. Further studies on patients' satisfaction should additionally pay attention to treatment expectations formed by the previous experience of treatment, service-related knowledge, stigma and patients' disempowerment, and power imbalance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Psychology 11 11%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 38 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,530,416
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#2,163
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,568
of 309,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#43
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.