↓ Skip to main content

Long-acting methylphenidate formulations in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review of head-to-head studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
Title
Long-acting methylphenidate formulations in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review of head-to-head studies
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-237
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Coghill, Tobias Banaschewski, Alessandro Zuddas, Antonio Pelaz, Antonella Gagliano, Manfred Doepfner

Abstract

The stimulant methylphenidate (MPH) has been a mainstay of treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) for many years. Owing to the short half-life and the issues associated with multiple daily dosing of immediate-release MPH formulations, a new generation of long-acting MPH formulations has emerged. Direct head-to-head studies of these long-acting MPH formulations are important to facilitate an evaluation of their comparative pharmacokinetics and efficacy; however, to date, relatively few head-to-head studies have been performed.The objective of this systematic review was to compare the evidence available from head-to-head studies of long-acting MPH formulations and provide information that can guide treatment selection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 250 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Other 20 8%
Other 53 21%
Unknown 60 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 23%
Psychology 45 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 6%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 68 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,049,931
of 23,298,349 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,541
of 4,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,469
of 205,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#35
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,298,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.