Title |
[18F]Flutemetamol amyloid-beta PET imaging compared with [11C]PIB across the spectrum of Alzheimer’s disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00259-013-2564-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shizuo Hatashita, Hidetomo Yamasaki, Yutaka Suzuki, Kumiko Tanaka, Daichi Wakebe, Hideki Hayakawa |
Abstract |
The aim was to identify the amyloid beta (Aβ) deposition by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with the (18)F-labeled Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) derivative [(18)F]flutemetamol (FMM) across a spectrum of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to compare Aβ deposition between [(18)F]FMM and [(11)C]PIB PET imaging. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 99 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
Researcher | 14 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
Other | 20 | 20% |
Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 33% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 9% |
Psychology | 7 | 7% |
Engineering | 6 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 19% |
Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2013.
All research outputs
#3,111,268
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#292
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,560
of 209,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.