↓ Skip to main content

Reward Circuitry in Addiction

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
471 Mendeley
Title
Reward Circuitry in Addiction
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13311-017-0525-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Cooper, A.J. Robison, Michelle S. Mazei-Robison

Abstract

Understanding the brain circuitry that underlies reward is critical to improve treatment for many common health issues, including obesity, depression, and addiction. Here we focus on insights into the organization and function of reward circuitry and its synaptic and structural adaptations in response to cocaine exposure. While the importance of certain circuits, such as the mesocorticolimbic dopamine pathway, are well established in drug reward, recent studies using genetics-based tools have revealed functional changes throughout the reward circuitry that contribute to different facets of addiction, such as relapse and craving. The ability to observe and manipulate neuronal activity within specific cell types and circuits has led to new insight into not only the basic connections between brain regions, but also the molecular changes within these specific microcircuits, such as neurotrophic factor and GTPase signaling or α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor function, that underlie synaptic and structural plasticity evoked by drugs of abuse. Excitingly, these insights from preclinical rodent work are now being translated into the clinic, where transcranial magnetic simulation and deep brain stimulation therapies are being piloted in human cocaine dependence. Thus, this review seeks to summarize current understanding of the major brain regions implicated in drug-related behaviors and the molecular mechanisms that contribute to altered connectivity between these regions, with the postulation that increased knowledge of the plasticity within the drug reward circuit will lead to new and improved treatments for addiction.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 471 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 469 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 17%
Student > Bachelor 79 17%
Student > Master 68 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 7%
Researcher 31 7%
Other 50 11%
Unknown 130 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 132 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 8%
Psychology 35 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 7%
Other 46 10%
Unknown 150 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#1,030
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,515
of 326,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#15
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.