| Title |
Hip Dysplasia Is More Severe in Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth Disease Than in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3127-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduardo N. Novais, Sara D. Bixby, John Rennick, Patrick M. Carry, YoungJo Kim, Michael B. Millis |
| Abstract |
Patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease may develop hip dysplasia. Hip geometry in these patients has not been well described in the literature. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 54% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,750
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,999
of 207,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#43
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.