| Title |
“Let’s pull these technologies out of the ivory tower”: The politics, ethos, and ironies of participant-driven genomic research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioSocieties, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1057/s41292-017-0043-6 |
| Authors |
Michelle L. McGowan, Suparna Choudhury, Eric T. Juengst, Marcie Lambrix, Richard A. Settersten, Jennifer R. Fishman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 32% |
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 39% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 23 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,393,030
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BioSocieties
#24
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,931
of 326,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioSocieties
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.