| Title |
Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-013-3213-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gyusung I. Lee, Mija R. Lee, Tamera Clanton, Erica Sutton, Adrian E. Park, Michael R. Marohn |
| Abstract |
We conducted this study to investigate how physical and cognitive ergonomic workloads would differ between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries and whether any ergonomic differences would be related to surgeons' robotic surgery skill level. Our hypothesis is that the unique features in robotic surgery will demonstrate skill-related results both in substantially less physical and cognitive workload and uncompromised task performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 23% |
| Unknown | 35 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 32% |
| Engineering | 34 | 20% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Design | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 48 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,762,733
of 24,917,903 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,232
of 6,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,706
of 214,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#15
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,917,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,696 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.