↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: SAGES video classics

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
Title
Erratum to: SAGES video classics
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00464-013-3234-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Michael Brunt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,349,805
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,737
of 6,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,596
of 207,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#65
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,011 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.