Title |
Reconsidering Access: Park Facilities and Neighborhood Disamenities in New York City
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Urban Health, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11524-011-9551-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher C. Weiss, Marnie Purciel, Michael Bader, James W. Quinn, Gina Lovasi, Kathryn M. Neckerman, Andrew G. Rundle |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 179 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 25% |
Student > Master | 36 | 19% |
Researcher | 23 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
Other | 25 | 13% |
Unknown | 26 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 52 | 28% |
Environmental Science | 23 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 6% |
Design | 11 | 6% |
Engineering | 10 | 5% |
Other | 35 | 19% |
Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,117,221
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#542
of 1,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,303
of 112,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.