↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and severity of oral disease in adults with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of observational studies

Overview of attention for article published in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and severity of oral disease in adults with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of observational studies
Published in
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, September 2013
DOI 10.1093/ndt/gft401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marinella Ruospo, Suetonia C. Palmer, Jonathan C. Craig, Giorgio Gentile, David W. Johnson, Pauline J. Ford, Marcello Tonelli, Massimo Petruzzi, Michele De Benedittis, Giovanni F.M. Strippoli

Abstract

Oral disease may be increased in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and, due to associations with inflammation and malnutrition, represents a potential modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. We summarized the prevalence of oral disease in adults with CKD and explored any association between oral disease and mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 170 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 21 12%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 46 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
#4,539
of 6,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,018
of 217,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
#51
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.